1. 16 Jun, 2016 1 commit
    • Robert Knight's avatar
      Dim other annotations on standalone reply pages · 8107b000
      Robert Knight authored
      On the standalone pages for replies, indicate the reply which the page
      is for by lightening the usernames and bodies of other annotations in the
      thread and darkening the username and body of the annotation whose ID
      appears in the URL.
      8107b000
  2. 15 Jun, 2016 4 commits
    • Robert Knight's avatar
      Fix real-time updates from standalone pages · af8ca570
      Robert Knight authored
      Fix a type error where annotation objects rather than IDs were passed to
      the streamer configuration on standalone annotation pages.
      af8ca570
    • Robert Knight's avatar
      Make the standalone annotation page work for replies (#3474) · cf67a91d
      Robert Knight authored
      When displaying a standalone annotation page for replies, display the
      entire conversation thread which that reply is in, including the
      original annotation.
      
      Previously standalone annotation pages for replies were broken because
      only the reply itself was fetched, the the existence of the top-level
      annotation was inferred from the reply's `references` field but because
      it was missing, a blank "Message not available" card was shown instead.
      
      Showing the entire thread fixes this problem and also allows the user to
      see the complete context of the conversation.
      
      Also refactor the tests to be less tied to the implementation details of
      the class and expressed more in terms of what the view does from a
      user's point of view.
      
      Fixes #3367
      cf67a91d
    • Sean Hammond's avatar
      Merge pull request #3458 from hypothesis/add-nipsa-service · c667e5c7
      Sean Hammond authored
      Add a NIPSA service to replace h.nipsa.logic
      c667e5c7
    • Nick Stenning's avatar
      Merge pull request #3437 from hypothesis/wyan/feature-cohorts-on-off · ca4170d2
      Nick Stenning authored
      Allow admins to toggle specific features for a features cohort
      ca4170d2
  3. 13 Jun, 2016 8 commits
  4. 10 Jun, 2016 14 commits
  5. 09 Jun, 2016 9 commits
  6. 07 Jun, 2016 3 commits
  7. 06 Jun, 2016 1 commit
    • Robert Knight's avatar
      Implement new design for hovered conversation threads (#3376) · a3f910d3
      Robert Knight authored
      * Implement new design for hovered conversation threads
      
      Implement the new design for hovered replies from
      https://trello.com/c/aXCXxzx2 .
      
      The most visible effect is that conversation threads have a grey
      background when hovered.
      
      In the process of implementing the new styling, there is some cleanup
      of the CSS:
      
       * Use `--reply`/`--top-reply` modifier classes on <annotation> and
         <annotation-thread> elements to style annotations, top-level replies
         and nested replies differently. This makes the CSS simpler and
         reduces the risk of unexpected side effects that come with descendant
         selectors.
      
       * Rename `thread` CSS classes to match the name of the component
         that they are used in, `annotation-thread`.
      
      * Move 'annotation-unavailable-message' styling to app.scss
      
      This class is used in the root template (viewer.html) not the
      <annotation-thread> component.
      
      * Darken expand/collapse toggle arrow only when annotation itself is hovered
      
      Darken the expand/collapse arrow when an annotation is hovered but not
      when its replies are hovered.
      
      * Remove no-op CSS class
      
      The `clear: both` styling had no effect because <annotation-thread>
      is now using flexbox rather than floats for layout.
      
      * Do not show 'Hide replies' link for replies
      
      For replies there were two different ways to collapse the annotation
      card, the expand/collapse toggle arrow and the 'Hide replies' link.
      
      Removing the 'Hide replies' link avoids having two ways to do the same
      thing and makes the cards look cleaner.
      
      * Remove the light grey background for hovered replies
      
      Following design review, remove the grey background for hovered replies.
      
      * Make rendering of dashed lines to the left of replies better in Chrome
      
      Previously the dashed line started at the top of the <annotation-thread>
      component and the top part was covered up by the thread expand/collapse
      toggle.
      
      In Chrome the alignment of dashes within a dashed border varies as the
      height of the element changes [1]. Therefore depending on the height of
      the reply, this could result in the visible part of the line below the
      collapse/expand toggle starting at either a gap or dash in the line.
      
      By instead moving the dashed line to a separate element which is
      positioned beneath the expand/collapse toggle, the first visible dash in
      the reply line always appears in the same place and is aligned correctly
      with the annotation content to its right.
      
      [1] See http://www.impressivewebs.com/comparison-css-border-style/
          for a visual representation of why this is done.
      a3f910d3